Volvo Xc60: MOT pass rate and reliability data
The Volvo Xc60 passes its MOT first time more often than the average UK car, by 4.5 percentage points. These figures come from the DVSA's full year of anonymised MOT results, covering 90,521 individual Volvo Xc60 tests. Nothing here is an estimate or a survey.
The numbers
| First-time pass rate | 81.2% |
| UK national average | 76.7% |
| Difference | +4.5 points |
| Tests analysed | 90,521 |
| Average mileage at test | 84,519 miles |
| Average year of manufacture | 2015 |
| Reliability rank | 1,403 of 2,005 models |
What this means if you are buying one
A 81.2% first-time pass rate means roughly 19 in every 100 Volvo Xc60s presented for MOT fail on the first attempt. That is better than average, so a well-kept example is a reasonably safe used buy. The average Volvo Xc60 tested had covered 84,519 miles and was built around 2015.
What this means at salvage auction
Pass rate is a proxy for what a car costs to keep on the road. The Volvo Xc60 sits 4.5 points above the national average, ranked 1,403 of 2,005 models. On one bought as repairable salvage, the mechanical side is less likely to spring surprises, so your repair estimate should hold up reasonably well.
Before you bid: run the lot through the analyzer, check the car's own record, check the mileage, decode the VIN, and if it carries a marker use the write-off value calculator. Or compare it against another model.
Looking at a specific Volvo Xc60 rather than the model in general? The free check covers its MOT and mileage history, and the full HPI report confirms the insurance write-off category, outstanding finance and whether it is recorded stolen, from licensed data for 5 credits. Already own one that has been damaged? Work out whether fixing it beats selling it with the repair or scrap calculator, and see the median recorded closing bid for a damaged Volvo Xc60: £1,650 at UK salvage auction, from 10 ended listings, not independently confirmed sales.
Most common MOT failures on a Volvo Xc60
- A spring or spring component fractured or seriously weakened, 4.8% of tests (2.09x the national rate for this defect)
- A direction indicator lamp missing, inoperative or in the case of a multiple light source more than 1/2 not functioning, 1.3% of tests (2x the national rate for this defect)
- Steering rack gaiter or ball joint dust cover missing or no longer prevents the ingress of dirt etc, 1.2% of tests (1.68x the national rate for this defect)
- a brake lining or pad worn below 1.5mm, 3.5% of tests (1.61x the national rate for this defect)
- Tyre tread depth not in accordance with the requirements, 3.1% of tests
- A tyre seriously damaged, 2.5% of tests
- A tyre cords visible or damaged, 1.5% of tests
- A suspension pin, bush or joint excessively worn, 1.3% of tests
- Engine MIL illuminated indicating a malfunction, 1% of tests
- Wiper blade missing or obviously not clearing the windscreen, 1% of tests
From 90,432 DVSA-tracked Volvo Xc60 tests, 2024. DVSA testers marked 6.28% of these flagged Volvo Xc60 defects as "dangerous", meaning the tester judged the car unsafe to drive away, against 5.11% nationally.
Most common MOT advisories on a Volvo Xc60
An advisory doesn't fail the car - the tester flags it as worth watching, but it still passes. A different list from the failures above: what testers are noting on a Volvo Xc60 before it actually fails on it.
- Power steering fluid leaking or system malfunctioning, 0.5% of tests (2.06x the national rate for this advisory)
- Brake disc or drum significantly and obviously worn, 5.7% of tests (1.8x the national rate for this advisory)
- a brake lining or pad worn below 1.5mm, 15.5% of tests (1.65x the national rate for this advisory), also fails
- Tyre tread depth not in accordance with the requirements, 30.9% of tests (1.16x the national rate for this advisory), also fails
- A tyre seriously damaged, 14.4% of tests, also fails
- A suspension pin, bush or joint excessively worn, 9.8% of tests, also fails
- Brake disc or drum excessively weakened, insecure or fractured, 9% of tests
- Number plate inscription missing or illegible, 2.2% of tests
- Fluid leaking excessively and likely to harm the environment or to pose a safety risk to other road users, 2.1% of tests
- A spring or spring component fractured or seriously weakened, 2.1% of tests, also fails
From 90,432 DVSA-tracked Volvo Xc60 tests, 2024.
Volvo Xc60 pass rate by model year
From its 2009 to its 2019 model year, the Volvo Xc60's first-time pass rate has risen 15.2 points, from 74.6% to 89.8%, the usual pattern: a newer model year is a younger car today, so it fails less. First-time pass rate for each Volvo Xc60 year:
- 2008 Volvo Xc60 - 66.2% first-time pass, 266 tests
- 2009 Volvo Xc60 - 74.6% first-time pass, 2,945 tests
- 2010 Volvo Xc60 - 73.8% first-time pass, 4,182 tests
- 2011 Volvo Xc60 - 74.4% first-time pass, 4,438 tests
- 2012 Volvo Xc60 - 75.6% first-time pass, 4,891 tests
- 2013 Volvo Xc60 - 78.2% first-time pass, 5,141 tests
- 2014 Volvo Xc60 - 78% first-time pass, 8,819 tests
- 2015 Volvo Xc60 - 80.1% first-time pass, 12,597 tests
- 2016 Volvo Xc60 - 81.6% first-time pass, 14,712 tests
- 2017 Volvo Xc60 - 84.5% first-time pass, 14,758 tests
- 2018 Volvo Xc60 - 89.4% first-time pass, 10,827 tests
- 2019 Volvo Xc60 - 89.8% first-time pass, 6,363 tests
Volvo Xc60 by fuel type
The Volvo Xc60's two most-tested fuel types split by 8.2 points: diesel passes first time 80.6% of the time (80,155 tests) against 88.8% for petrol (8,418 tests).
- Diesel Volvo Xc60 - 80.6% first-time pass, 80,155 tests
- Petrol Volvo Xc60 - 88.8% first-time pass, 8,418 tests
- Hybrid Volvo Xc60 - 89% first-time pass, 1,560 tests
Other Volvo models
- Volvo V40 - 76.1%
- Volvo Xc90 - 75.2%
- Volvo Xc40 - 90.5%
- Volvo V70 - 69%
- Volvo V60 - 79%
- Volvo V50 - 60.4%
- Volvo C30 - 65.2%
- Volvo S60 - 75.2%
Models with a similar pass rate
- Tesla Model 3 Performance Awd - 81.4%
- Jaguar Xjs - 81.4%
- Vauxhall Combo 2000 Sportive Td - 81.3%
- BMW X5 - 81.2%
- Citroen Berlingo 1000 Eprise Pro Bhdi - 81.2%
- Toyota Proace City Active - 81.2%
If this car is a salvage or write-off
- What does Cat N mean? Category N explained
- What does Cat S mean? Category S explained
- Cat S vs Cat N: the real differences
- Do you need an HPI check on a car you know is a write-off?
Embed this data
Run a site about the Volvo Xc60? Embed the real DVSA pass-rate badge free, linked back to this page.
<a href="https://www.salvageprophet.co.uk/mot/volvo-xc60"><img src="https://www.salvageprophet.co.uk/badge/volvo-xc60.svg" width="340" height="92" alt="Volvo Xc60 MOT Pass Rate: 81.2% - Salvage Prophet"></a>
Run a garage or parts site? Embed the Volvo Xc60's top real failure reason instead, linked back here.
<a href="https://www.salvageprophet.co.uk/mot/volvo-xc60"><img src="https://www.salvageprophet.co.uk/badge/failure/volvo-xc60.svg" width="340" height="106" alt="Volvo Xc60 most common MOT failure: A spring or spring component fractured or seriously weakened (4.8% of tests) - Salvage Prophet"></a>